[Female] Looks 'Shopped; why that MAY not be a problem

Discussion in 'Member Photos and Videos' started by IdoPiddleSome2, Sep 3, 2013.

  1. IdoPiddleSome2

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    WV (for now)
    OK; when I see what looks like a seriously edited image online, I do consider the possibility it's some sort of digital-photo-defamation. Is the face edited onto the body, to "make" an Internet-porn-star of someone who's never actually posed naked ANYWHERE for a photo?

    But, when it looks edited with the same face & body, in multiple poses & locations (especially outdoor locations), I have to wonder if there's something else afoot.

    http://hardgrannypics.com/scj/thumbs/galleries/0/161/3_676.jpg

    This same head and body, including her eyewear, appears (with the same subtly unreal differences in lighting & contrast-levels), in a variety of Outdoor-Exhibitionist photos, in a variety of poses. The head & body look as well-matched to each-other as in the pic at the link. She just doesn't quite look like she was IN the rest of the photo.

    Could be a creative way to appear barefoot-up-to-THERE in places one wouldn't actually risk posing--with just a bit of plausible-deniability embedded in each picture, just in case. Does that mean I'd pose for such digital hanky-panky, myself?:lol:p Think I'm taking the 5th!:phat
     
  2. minskminx

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    764
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    UK
    It is very nice of you to bring this to our attention but I will perhaps not click on a 'hardgrannypics.com' link.

    There are some things we should not see. :)
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice