Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Member Photos and Videos' started by cum, Apr 12, 2011.
What are your thoughts?
Sharing twins - XNXX.COM
shitty quality and even pretend incest is disgusting.
I thought it was pretty hot myself. The girls are cute, and it didn't have too much of the annoying stuff usually found in porn. Also didn't see anything incestuous. They came in close proximity of each other many times but never actually did anything to each other, it was all about the guy.
My only gripe? Right around the 8:30 mark was probably the hottest shot for me, and then BAM big fucking watermark/promo across the middle of it, blocking most of it. That sucked.
Thanks for sharing, cum. :tup
VERY much agree with you Mittimer:down
pretty hot ill give it a 7.5 outa 10 lol
YEAH you are right - incest is BLJAK :ignore
Pretty hot. But, aside from the novelty factor I suppose, what's the point in having two exactly the same? I would think it would be much hotter to have two very different girls. I never understood that about Hugh Hefner. He has a mansion full of beauties and they're all exactly the same! If I were to surround myself with gorgeous men to have sex with I'd have one blond with grey eyes, one black hair with blue eyes, one brown hair with brown eyes, one rippling with muscles, one short and fast, one tall and lean, one large and mean... hmmm... now I have another idea for a story
–noun 1. sexual intercourse between closely related persons.
2. the crime of sexual intercourse, cohabitation, or marriage between persons within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity wherein marriage is legally forbidden.
I still don't get everyone QQing about "incest." There is none in that vid. Being related and naked together is not incest, and those girls aren't touching or having sex with each other. It's not even implied. Sheesh. ???