Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Dog_E_Ryder, Dec 28, 2015.
Saw this on I love fucking science page. Interesting.
That was awesome, thanks!
Not watching it lol!
That was certainly strange and one of the last things I ever expected to see...but it was pretty interesting nonetheless, lol.
I want one
all done in 2:23 including prep, kiss after, and even a narrator during the middle!.
Don't be scared, I'll hold ya..
They were going for the record, but my record still stands at 1:09 (narrated by Morgan Freeman).
lol awesome! thanks for sharing!
Most bad porn uses only one camera. This one used four. And yes, it was bad porn. Bad technique by the man, unconvincing moans dubbed in, and so on. Oh, and the head of the penis inside didn't match that man's penis when we saw it outside. I love to fuck science too.
I was so fascinated by that clip that I totally missed all those things Meee picked up on and I am a fucking scientists!
Normally Meee's comments sends me into raptures but this time it was a rupturing experience
Anyway the redeeming feature was that the narrators accents were in refined & cultured English!
Therefore now armed with all this wisdom I am going back for another sperm view of things
These videos were done for a British tv show 10 years or so ago. They certainly weren't intended to be porn lol.
Everything is porn if you look at it the right way. After all, I can't define porn but I know it when I see it.
I'm sure millions of British teenagers used it as such when it was aired
Come to think about it the strung dude did not have a proper hard on when he alleged popped it into her electrified pussy
Meee is right after all it was all smokin' mirrors!
I've watched a series of "Better Sex" vids from the Sinclair Institute that had couples engage in numerous amateur presentations that were highly informative (and a DAMN PLEASURE to view) that I would NOT consider porn.
Having back reviewed the zaprudo fuck tape the Ryder/Warren commission has confirmed at :20 time stamp of the tape that fucker 1 is witnessed and established with a adequate hard on entering the suspected entrance of the fuckee, which eliminates any theory of a fucker 2 being in the bush vicinity. There is the possibility of a fluffer lurking in the vicinity though. This conclusively concludes fucker 1 acted alone.
I'm sorry if it was a rupturing experience, but I think it might have been the couch you were sitting on.