[Female] Looks 'Shopped; why that MAY not be a problem

Discussion in 'Adult Photos and Videos' started by IdoPiddleSome2, Sep 3, 2013.

  1. IdoPiddleSome2

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    WV (for now)
    OK; when I see what looks like a seriously edited image online, I do consider the possibility it's some sort of digital-photo-defamation. Is the face edited onto the body, to "make" an Internet-porn-star of someone who's never actually posed naked ANYWHERE for a photo?

    But, when it looks edited with the same face & body, in multiple poses & locations (especially outdoor locations), I have to wonder if there's something else afoot.

    http://hardgrannypics.com/scj/thumbs/galleries/0/161/3_676.jpg

    This same head and body, including her eyewear, appears (with the same subtly unreal differences in lighting & contrast-levels), in a variety of Outdoor-Exhibitionist photos, in a variety of poses. The head & body look as well-matched to each-other as in the pic at the link. She just doesn't quite look like she was IN the rest of the photo.

    Could be a creative way to appear barefoot-up-to-THERE in places one wouldn't actually risk posing--with just a bit of plausible-deniability embedded in each picture, just in case. Does that mean I'd pose for such digital hanky-panky, myself?:lol:p Think I'm taking the 5th!:phat
     
  2. minskminx

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    716
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    UK
    It is very nice of you to bring this to our attention but I will perhaps not click on a 'hardgrannypics.com' link.

    There are some things we should not see. :)