In a similar vein as Everett's thread

Discussion in 'General Sex Discussion' started by Texas_Red, Feb 12, 2013.

  1. Texas_Red

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    14
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I was going to post this as a reply to http://www.sexualforums.com/40093-shaved-pubic-hair-fetish.html but realized what I wanted to say wasn't quite in the same vein, but a bit of an off-shoot.

    5 image gallery of Selena Gomez.

    Now, to me, what I find best about the images? That they aren't photoshopped and airbrushed all to hell. They made her eye whites really white, that's it. So her skin texture, body hair, moles, veins/capillaries, etc.; all things that many would consider flaws and unattractive, are there. I like them quite a bit. It's natural, and it's real. I appreciate it. Granted it's not quite the same as the issue of armpit hair and pubic hair, etc. but I think it lends itself to contrast the argument of the overall image provided for girls/women daily by most magazines.

    Real people aren't air-brushed all to hell. They aren't hairless, with flawless porcelain smooth skin, ultra bright white teeth and eyes, etc. Seriously, next time you go through the checkout line in a grocery store, take a look at the alterations of people on the covers. It's scary. This shit is all around us, and we cannot ever measure up, because it's not real.

    I've become rather apathetic to the vast majority of porn for the same reason. 99% of videos are completely fucking retarded, and all the stupid faces and sounds and things they do kill it for me. Pictures aren't too different. Garishly fake tits, over-processed models, too much make-up, etc. etc. It's a real boner-killer for me. When I do look at porn and such, it's for diamonds in the rough anymore. Almost a chore, odd as that might sound. Cursory glances and then on to the next image or album or whatever.

    So what say you all? Would you like to see more photos follow the example of the linked ones, or do you prefer the current gold standard of super post-processing?
     
    #1 Texas_Red, Feb 12, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2013
  2. Hot Wheels

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,415
    Likes Received:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sydney,Australia
    I hear exactly what your saying too mate.....:tup
    It's for this very reason I've been surfing amateur porn for the last few years....I find it much more representative of "real" women...

    As for Selena.....
    Is she cute and realistic?......definately....:D
    Would I hit it?........hell yeah.....:slong
     
    #2 Hot Wheels, Feb 13, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2013
  3. lbushwalker

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Messages:
    6,960
    Likes Received:
    5,071
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    'Stralia Mate!
    Can't argue about that at all TR :shrug
     
  4. Cappy_Dick

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,288
    Likes Received:
    2,645
    Gender:
    Male
    Unfortunately, media in the post WW I era has created a false sense of what is beautiful. The more that media has grown and become technically advanced, the more unrealistic the "expectations" have become. The sad truth is, average people are sheep and will believe what the media conditions them to. Look at pre- WW I art. Throughout the ages, women that were considered beautiful, looked quite different from the modern manufactured image.

    I have also found that "real life" people that come close to fitting the Madison Ave/Hollywood standard of attractive, tend to be quite shallow people and often lousy lovers. Manufactured tits are the biggest joke of all. They look and feel rediculous. Trust me, I can tell. There was once a pictorial poll online of 50 sets of tits. You had to choose real or fake. I scored 47 correct.

    As for pubic hair: I was a young adult when the shaving craze started. I thought I liked it then. Probably because back then, it was all or nothing. I was pretty much into dark haired gals back then, so either they shaved or had a crazy thick bush that made me want them to shave. Now that I am mature, I have grown to prefer a woman to have a well groomed, but not shaved pussy. Or even better yet, a fair skinned natural blonde, who's garden grows naturally short and sparse.

    As for men in this area, Very few women find a totally shaved man attractive. I have practiced manscaping, long before it was considered fashionable or cool. I am of Eastern European heritage and tend to grow very long pubes. Being a big fan of oral, I have always kept mine managed with trimming it short with a beard trimmer and a bit of shaving around the shaft bottom and balls area. Most woman who enjoy oral appreciate this as well. Some would disagree, but I don't think totally shaved men look sexy at all. I discovered this back in the day. I had a new partner and wanted her to shave for me. She agreed, under the condition that I shaved my junk for her. So, out of fairness, I did. We both agreed that it looked rediculous, and I went back to manscaping.

    At the end of the day, I think pubic hair, be it bushy, groomed or gone, should be the choice of the people involved and not dictated by psuedo fashion.

    xx