I was going to post this as a reply to http://www.sexualforums.com/40093-shaved-pubic-hair-fetish.html but realized what I wanted to say wasn't quite in the same vein, but a bit of an off-shoot. 5 image gallery of Selena Gomez. Now, to me, what I find best about the images? That they aren't photoshopped and airbrushed all to hell. They made her eye whites really white, that's it. So her skin texture, body hair, moles, veins/capillaries, etc.; all things that many would consider flaws and unattractive, are there. I like them quite a bit. It's natural, and it's real. I appreciate it. Granted it's not quite the same as the issue of armpit hair and pubic hair, etc. but I think it lends itself to contrast the argument of the overall image provided for girls/women daily by most magazines. Real people aren't air-brushed all to hell. They aren't hairless, with flawless porcelain smooth skin, ultra bright white teeth and eyes, etc. Seriously, next time you go through the checkout line in a grocery store, take a look at the alterations of people on the covers. It's scary. This shit is all around us, and we cannot ever measure up, because it's not real. I've become rather apathetic to the vast majority of porn for the same reason. 99% of videos are completely fucking retarded, and all the stupid faces and sounds and things they do kill it for me. Pictures aren't too different. Garishly fake tits, over-processed models, too much make-up, etc. etc. It's a real boner-killer for me. When I do look at porn and such, it's for diamonds in the rough anymore. Almost a chore, odd as that might sound. Cursory glances and then on to the next image or album or whatever. So what say you all? Would you like to see more photos follow the example of the linked ones, or do you prefer the current gold standard of super post-processing?